Tags:
Permalink Reply by Anne Westlund on October 2, 2011 at 17:59 Here's my reading for today.
Random Bookshelf Reading 22
Question: Today? (Tell me about today?)
Answer: "Aphrodite
What happened to her at an early age to make this archetype dominate her personality? Was she treated like the favored child and spoiled for her innocent alluring behavior? Did she live in a culture where women were encouraged to be open and giving? Was she sexually abused and is now acting out her abuse unconsciously by sleeping around and degrading herself?"(p.27)
Permalink Reply by F on October 2, 2011 at 18:17 My "find' is: "The world your work describes is the world you promote."
The convergence here could be that the acts of parenting rather than the words of parenting are the world you create for and of your children.
Permalink Reply by Anne Westlund on October 3, 2011 at 0:32
Permalink Reply by F on October 3, 2011 at 1:17
Permalink Reply by Nancy on October 3, 2011 at 2:54 re: Fritzie's quote
Here I find the statement somewhat obvious yet somewhat obscure at the same time.
It stands to reason that the work you do (by choice) represents the world you believe in and therefor promote through the products and outcome of your work.
Permalink Reply by Anne Westlund on October 3, 2011 at 0:29
Permalink Reply by F on October 3, 2011 at 1:20
Permalink Reply by Nancy on October 3, 2011 at 2:49 re:Anne's quote
Not knowing the context and from a purely phycological view point, I look at this passage as a study in behavioural responses based on a set of circumstances, all the while implying that 'she' had no choices in how she behaves as an adult/grown woman. It is a limited understanding of responsibility and a dated viewpoint of women in general, especially the reference to her sexual behaviors. None of that would be applied to a male raised in similar circumstances...even today.
Permalink Reply by Anne Westlund on October 3, 2011 at 17:54
Permalink Reply by F on October 3, 2011 at 19:43 Mine for today is: Style emerges; it is not a product of self-conscious selection.
The first association that comes to me is the raging debate going on among my students as to which personality traits and dispositions related to creative activity are inborn and which subject to development. It is well established that none is all one or all the other, but some traits are more genetically driven.
With slight adjustment one might ask whether people who get angry when other people's plans and activities interfere with their most pressing agenda may face that challenge with some inborn intolerance and egotism.
That said, life is easier when one learns to make lemonade from lemons, sees the cup half full rather than half empty and so forth.
Permalink Reply by Nancy on October 4, 2011 at 0:43 On midsummer's morn or at dawn of the spring equinox, the turf labyrinths would be walked or run or more probably danced to ensure a good crop. Barren women may have slept in the centre of these labyrinths at the full moon to ensure pregnancy, as they did with ancient chalk hill figures, such as the Cerne Abas Giant, near Dorset. It is probable that the Puritans from Elizabethan times on, classified them with Maypoles and mince pies as dangerous pagan superstition.
from The Spirituality of Mazes and Labyrinths by Gailand MacQeen.
I have always marvelled at the concept of superstitions from both sides of the coin. Those who practice them for some hoped for results and those who fear them and try to control others use of them because they still believe they have the possibility of having specific powers.
I just now, also wonder how many superstitions have taken root in out own lives without our conscious awareness of them?
And.....Does/can having a belief help to transfer a genuine power to an object or ritual?
© 2012 Created by Dan Goodwin.