I guess the title to this post does not quite express in full what I am trying to ask. As artists, we seem to have a 'trademark' that comes through in all our work. Recently, a producer who was making some safety videos came to me to compose the music. She loves my work, but in her mind she had a particular song and gave that to me as an example of what she wanted. Needless to say, as an artist, I am not out to imitate someone else (not to mention the legal aspects of copying someone's work!). But this woman refused to step away from that particular song and no matter what was given to her she did not feel was 'gritty' enough (not to mention people always comment on the healing aspect to my work, not its grittiness). Everyone else who saw the video to the music loved it...except her. She was not convinced, but loved the music. Seeing that I was not going to be able to oblige, I quickly pulled out of the project. As it stands, the project has no music because no matter what she auditioned since (now from library/stock files), she cannot find her music.
Now she is coming to me for a major network series...and I am not sure about this. If you look at many TV/film composers (John Barry, Jerry Goldsmith, Lee Holdridge, John Williams, etc), they all have a style and set films they have composed for, all within a certain range. People normally will come to us because they love what we've done and want more of it, but tailored to their vision. However, not always....
So, my questions are: Have you ever been commissioned to create work that is just not 'you' to create, no matter how hard you'd try? At what point do you draw the line between talent, compromise and simply what just won't come out of you? And how do you explain this to someone else (i.e. family, work partners, manager, etc.)?
Tags:
Share
-
▶ Reply to This